It is a fundamental task of HVAC to provide occupantsa healthy and comfort environment. By far more and more attention has been paidto indoor air quality(IAQ). Excellent indoor air ensures health of occupants.It has become a worldwide problem and caused many sick building syndromes(SBS)and building related illness(BRI), which can not be ignored. Indoor air qualitywould be one of the most important problems which developers, owners, proprietorscare more about before entering 21st century.
But up to now, due to lack of accepted internationalspecific standard and uniform method of assessment on indoor air quality, inmany cases, some index and standards in assessment on outdoor atmosphere haveto be employed when assessing indoor air quality. Stressing on thispoint, a new assessment system, based on fuzzy mathematics, is put forward inthis paper. A full-scale assessment on indoor air quality of 6 high-risebuildings in Shanghai is carried through. All data are from measurement onsite.
Thereare thousands of pollutants in building. We can not measure every pollutantthat can impat occupant health and comfort, but we can select somerepresentative pollutants as indicator for different sort of indoorcontamination. The indicator and its reference value can provide a broadassessment of IAQ. The reasons for selecting indicators and their referencevalue are discussed as follows:
CO2: Indoor CO2 sproduced by the occupants and can be an useful indicator of the humanbioeffluents. ASHRAE Standard 62-1989 provides a recommended maximum CO2level of 1000 ppm, according to ASHRAE, this level is not a health risk but isa surrogate for odors produced by humans.
CO: CO is an indicator of combustionactivities because it is produced by combustion processes associated with someactivities such as cooking, smoking and so on. If the building has anunderground garage, motor vehicle operation is a potential source of CO for theoccupied portion of the building. There are no standards for maximum CO levelsfor office environments, but other guidelines are available. A maximum COconcentration of 10 ppm was selected for assessment based on the continuousexposure level recommended by the World Health Organization. If indoor levelsof CO exceed 10 ppm it could indicate a significant indoor source.
Inhalable Particles: Particles that areless than 10 micron in diameter (referred to as PM10) are of concern in termsof human health. Particles is also an indicator for occupant activities. Thereference value of a maximum short-term concentration of 0.15 mg/m3is based on the Nation Ambient Air Quality Standards set forth by EPA. Thisreference value applied to inhalable particles that are less than or equal to10 micron in diameter.
When we need investigation more detailed,other parameters can be added, such as SO2, NOx, andbacteria, so as to investigate the indoor combustion activities in detail.
Indoorair pollution is a major occupational health problem in occupied environments.The objective assessment of indoor air quality is usually difficult due to thecocktail effect of various pollutants. IAQ problems are often multi-factorialand difficult to analyze independent effect. Now a newobjective assessment system, based on fuzzy mathematics, is put forward in thispaper.
Thedefinition of fuzzy itself is indefinite. There is no specific finitude betweentwo opposite concepts, but some quantitative difference belonging toartificialness. The instances are very common, such as “young” and “old”, “tall”and “short”, “fat” and “thin”, “cleanness” and “pollution”, etc.. Fuzzy casesin measurement of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) are shown in the following table.
| IP | CO2 | CO | NO2 | SO2 | CFU |
| 150mg/m3 | 1000ppm | 10ppm | 50ppb | 25ppb | 30CFU/9cm·5min |
According as criterion of CO2 ofJapan, there is some explicit but illogical finitude after careful analysisamong the parameters above, such as, because the criterion of NO2 is50ppb, concentration of indoor NO2 of 50.01ppb, exceeding thestandard, belongs to be polluted, which can not be accepted by most people.
Indoor environment includes a lot ofpollutants, so definite evaluation can’t come from one pollutant. Ifconcentration of CO is 701vppm, between the first and the second grade, and atthe same time, another pollutant lies between the second and the third grade,then how we can evaluate the indoor air synthesizing all pollutants correctly?
Fuzzy mathematics figures out thisquestion. Now the mathematics model of fuzzy mathematics evaluation isintroduced first.
(1)Assorting Factors
In the following equation; j=1,2,…,n;k=1,2,…,p;
If there are n factors in the factors unitU: U={u1,u2,…,un}。
(2)Results Unit
Results unit is aggregate ofall possible results coming from final evaluation. If there is p possibleresults, the results unit may be : V=(v1,v2,……,vp)
(3)Factors Magnitude ValueUnit
According to the importanceof all factors in the factors unit, corresponding magnitude (value changingfrom 0~1) is given to every factor. If the magnitude value of the j factor ujis aj, there is factors magnitude unit: A=(a1,a2,……,an)。
The sum of all factors magnitude value is 1and all of them can not be negative.
(4)Subject Value andSubject Function
If an evaluated object belongs to thefactor k, vk, of results unit, its subject value is rjk.
(5)The First Degree FuzzySynthetical Evaluation
Synthetical evaluation is carried out byall factors from factors unit. Evaluated by the factor j, uj in thefactors unit, and If the evaluated object belongs to the factor k, vk,of results unit, its subject value is rjk, so the matrix of thefirst degree fuzzy synthetical evaluation is:
| R= | ![]() | there are n factors and p results |
The first degree fuzzy syntheticalevaluation unit is B=A°R
“°”is synthesis of fuzzy relationship.
When evaluating indoor air quality, it isthe most important that factors unit, subject function and magnitude value arebuilt first.
(1) Factors Unit
Because of the real testing condition, weonly choose PM10 (u1), CO2 (u2), CO (u3),NO2(u4), and bacteria(u5)as synthetical evaluation factors, so the factors unitis: u={u1,u2,u3,u4 , u5}。
(2) Subject Function
Subject functionhas several form, such as triangle, trapezoid, and bell, etc., so we can chooseone by experience. Now we choose the simple and visual triangle function.
In the left graph, there is:
Variable X1----The concentrationof cleanness;
Variable X2----The concentrationof pollution;
Point A----random point, that is, thispoint can be considered as cleanness or pollution.
The subject function F1(x), F2(x)are:
F1(x)=
F2(x)=
Now except Japanese criterion of CO2and bacteria (showing in Tab. 2 and Tab. 3), most criterion of indoor airpollutants have only one standard between polluted and unpolluted, which is notsuit for fuzzy evaluation. So on the basis of Chinese Atmosphere QualityStandard-- GB3095-96 (Tab. 4) and effect on human health of some mainpollutants, combined with the four- degree criterion put forward by World HealthOrganization in 1963, the three-degree criterion of Chinese AtmosphereQuality Standard, and Atmosphere Quality Standard (Tab.4), 定义各室内污染物的X1、X2of every indoor pollutants are defined as the following:
| Table2 Criterion of CO2 in Japan
| Table3 Criterion of CO2 in Japan
|
| DEGREE | CHARACTERISTIC |
| clean | Suit for human activity, meet with comfort request of most people. |
| unpolluted | No pollutant exceeding criterion, normal human activity |
| Polluted slightly | One pollutant exceeding criterion at least, no acute or chronic toxic sis except for hypersensitive people. |
| Middle-polluted | Two or three pollutants exceeding criterion, human health harmed obviously with serious harm on hypersensitive people. |
| Polluted seriously | Three or four pollutants exceeding criterion, human health harmed seriously with possible death of on hypersensitive people. |
| POLLUTANTS | X1 mg/m3 (ppm) | X2 mg/m3 (ppm) |
| PM10 | 0.05 | 0.25 |
| CO2 | 700ppm | 2000ppm |
| CO | 10.00 (9) | 20.00 (18) |
| NO2 | 0.12 (0.05) | 0.24 (0.1) |
| Bateria | 2 | 150 |
(3) Factors Magnitude ValueUnit
That is the magnitude of everypollutant in indoor air quality.
apm10=1/3、aco2=1/3、aco=1/9、ano2=1/9、acfu=1/9。
According to harm on humanhealth, we consider that the most important pollutant are PM10 and CO2,next is NO2、CFU、CO.
Six buildings are tested in July andAutumn, 1999. The testing focus on the indoor air quality and many valuabledata are collected. The following is the first degree fuzzy syntheticalevaluation of testing buildings.
Evaluation resultfrom calculating program: Building D, E, F are polluted, and the other threeare clean.
| PM10 mg/m3 | CO2 ppm | CO ppm | CFU/ 9cm×5min | NO2 ppm | |
| B | 0.064 | 486 | 0 | 2.27 | 0 |
| D | 0.118 | 938 | 0.0 | 47.45 | 0.15 |
| E | 0.107 | 940 | 0.235 | 4.9 | 0.08 |
| F | 0.318 | 713 | 0.91 | 6.0 | 0.036 |
| C | 0.069 | 622 | 0 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| G | 0.107 | 657 | 0.0 | 6.9 | 0.019 |
5.CONCLUSION
From the first degree fuzzy syntheticalevaluation on six office buildings in Shanghai, the merit of fuzzy mathematicsevaluation is obvious, it can synthesize all undefinite elements in evaluation.But it has some shortcomings, for example, the result can not be classifiedinto several degrees for lack of clear degree standard, except for CO2and bacteria. So, if the corresponding degree standard of several pollutants,such as NOX, SO2, O3, CO, TSP, PM10, can bebuilt, the fuzzy mathematics evaluation method for IAQ will be improvedgreatly.
1) Wang Fan, Fuzzy andEngineering Mathematics, Ha’ebin shipping Engineering Institute Publisher, 1988
2) Shen Jinming, Mao J., ObjectiveAssessment on IAQ in Shanghai Office Building, Journal of Ventilation andDust Control, 1995.4, p14-17
Wei Bai, Master, Department of Facility Engineering & Management, Tongji University,
Shanghai, P.R.China (200092)
Tel: 86-21-65980902 Fax: 86-21-65984588
E-mail:logiccat@sina.com
[责任编辑:tuzhi]